Competition law and monopolies in digital markets

Is competition law suitable for regulating digital markets?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.1.3

Keywords:

competition law, regulation of digital markets, sanctions

Abstract

The paper reviews how competition law, the application of competition rules and the objectives of competition policy can regulate the market behaviour of digital service providers. In the analysis of the rules and their potential application, the paper also draws on the results of economics to show in which areas competition law enforcement needs to improve and whether sector-specific regulation is needed.

References

Ahlborn, Christian – Grave, Carsten: Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism: An Introduction from a Consumer Welfare Perspective. 2(2) Competition Policy International (2006) 197–217.

Amato, Giuliano: Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market. Oxford, Hart, 1997.

Bain, Joe S.: A Note on Pricing in Monopoly and Oligopoly. 39(2) The American Economic Review (1949) 448–464.

Bain, Joe S.: Workable Competition in Oligopoly: Theoretical Considerations and Some Empirical Evidence. 40(2) The American Economic Review (1950) 35–47.

Baird, Douglas G. – Gertner, Robert H. – Picker, Randal C.: Game Theory and the Law. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300083835

Basedow, Jürgen: The Modernization of European Competition Law: A Story of Unfinished Concepts. 42 Texas International Law Journal (2006–2007) 429–439.

Berman, Elizabeth P.: Thinking Like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2022.

Bork, Robert H.: The Goals of Antitrust Policy. 57(2) The American Economic Review (1967) 242–253.

Bork, Robert H.: The Antitrust Paradox. New York, The Free Press, 1993.

Carlton, Dennis W. – Perloff, Jeffrey M.: Modern Industrial Organization. Boston, Pearson, 2015.

Cooter, Robert – Drexl, Josef: The Logic of Power in the Emerging European Constitution: Game Theory and the Division of Powers. 14(3) International Review of Law and Economics (1994) 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90046-9

Devlin, Alan: Reforming Antitrust. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Economides, Nicholas: Competition Policy in Network Industries: An Introduction. NET Institute Working Paper No. 04-24 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.386626

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter: The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Policy: A Legal and Cultural Revolution. 37(3) Common Market Law Review (2000) 537–590. https://doi.org/10.54648/267648

Evans, David S. – Nichols, Albert L. – Schamlensee, Richard: United States v Microsoft: Did Consumers Win? 1(3) Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2005) 497–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhi016, https://doi.org/10.3386/w11727, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.757426

Geradin, Damien – Reysen, Marc – Henry, David: Extraterritoriality, Comity and Cooperation in EC Competition Law, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1175003

Gerber, David J.: The Origins of European Competition Law in Fin-de-Siécle Austria. 36(4) American Journal of Legal History (1992) 405–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/845553

Gerber, David J.: Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-Liberalism, Competition Law and the „New” Europe. 42(1) The American Journal of Comparative Law (1994) 25–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/840727

Gerber, David J.: Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. Oxford, Clarendon, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/840974

Giocoli, Nicola: Competition Versus Property Rights: American Antitrust Law, the Freiburg School, and the Early Years of European Competition Policy. 4(5) Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2009) 747–786. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhp003

Hertfelder, Johannes: Die consumer welfare im europäischen Wettbewerbsrecht – Eine Analyse der Rechtspraxis der Kommission und die europäischen Gerichte. Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2010.

Hovenkamp, Herbert J.: Schumpeterian Competition and Antitrust. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law, 1788 (2008).

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1275986

Hovenkamp, Herbert: Antitrust and Platform Monopoly. 130(8) The Yale Law Journal (2021) 1952–2050. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3639142

Joshua, Julian M. – Camesasca, Peter D. – Youngjin, Jung: Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties: Cartel Enforcement’s Global Reach. 75(2) Antitrust Law Journal (2008) 353–397.

Khan, Lina M.: Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox. 126(3) Yale Law Journal (2017) 710–805.

Lemley, Mark A. – McGowan, David: Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects. 86 California Law Review (1998) 479–612. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rzhnp, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.32212

Leontief, Wassily: Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883–1950). 18(2) Econometrica (1950) 103–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907263

Lianos, Ioannis – Kokkoris, Ioannis: The Reform of EC Competition Law: New Challenges. Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2010.

MacCulloch, Angus: National Criminalisation of International Cartels. Lancaster University Working Paper, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1908178

Martyniszyn, Marek: Extraterritoriality in EU Competition Law. In Cunha Rodrigues, Nuno (szerk.): Extraterritoriality of EU Economic Law. Cham, Springer, 2021, 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82291-0_3

Melamed, A. Douglas – Rubinfeld, Daniel L.: U.S. v. Microsoft: Lessons Learned and Issues Raised. In Fox, Eleanor M. – Crane, Daniel A. (szerk.): Antitrust Stories. New York, Foundation Press, 2007, 287–310.

Motta, Massimo: Competition Policy – Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Möschel, Wernhard: The Proper Scope of Government Viewed from an Ordoliberal Perspective: The Example of Competition Policy. 157(1) Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (2001) 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1628/0932456012974657

Nash, John F. Jr.: The Bargaining Problem. 18(2) Econometrica (1950) 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884087-006

Nash, John: Two-Person Cooperative Games. 21(1) Econometrica (1953) 128–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906951

Nash, John F.: Essays on Game Theory. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1996. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781956298

Neumann, John von – Morgenstern, Oskar: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.

Orbach, Barak Y.: The Antitrust Consumer Welfare Paradox. 7(1) Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2011) 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhq019

Parker, Geoffrey – Petropoulos, Georgios – Van Alstyne, Marshall W.: Digital Platforms and Antitrust. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3608397

Pitofsky, Robert: How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Priest, George L.: The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition. 6(1) Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2010) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhp027

Schmalensee, Richard – Evans, David S.: Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-Sided Platforms. 3(1) Competition Policy International (2007) 151–179.

Schmidt, Ingo – Rittaler, Jan B.: Die Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis: Wettbewerbstheoretische und -politische Analyse eines Credos. Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1986.

Schmidt, Ingo – Rittaler, Jan B.: A Critical Evaluation of the Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1988.

Schumpeter, Joseph A.: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London, Allen and Unwin, 1976.

Stigler, George J.: Schumpeter’s History of Economic Analysis. 62(4) Journal of Political Economy (1954) 344–345.

Stigler, George J.: On the „Chicago School of Economics”: Comment. 70(1) The Journal of Political Economy (1962) 70–71.

Stucke, Maurice E.: Reconsidering Antitrust’s Goals. 53(2) Boston College Law Review (2012) 551–629. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1904686

Sükösd Péter: A globalizáció hatása az extraterritorialitás szemléletének kialakulására az EK és az USA versenyjogában. Magyar Jog, 2006/1., 46–55.

Szilágyi Pál – Tóth András: A kartellszabályozás történeti fejlődése. Versenytükör, 2016/2. különszám, 4–13.

Tirole, Jean: The Theory of Industrial Organisation. London, MIT, 1988.

Tóth Tihamér: A 60 éves Római Szerződés versenyjogi rendelkezései. Iustum Aequm Salutare, 2018/2., 57–75.

Tóth Tihamér: Uniós és magyar versenyjog. Budapest, Wolters Kluwer, 2020.

Tóth, Tihamér: The Camgbridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Varian, Hal R.: Use and Abuse of Network Effects. In Guzman, Martin (szerk.): Toward a Just Society: Joseph Stiglitz and Twenty-First Century Economics. New York, Columbia University Press, 2018, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3215488

Vatiero, Massimiliano: The Ordoliberal Notion of Market Power: An Institutionalist Reassessment. 6(3) European Competition Journal (2010) 689–707.

https://doi.org/10.5235/ecj.v6n3.689

Venit, James S.: Brave New World: The Modernization and Decentralization of Enforcement under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty. 40(3) Common Market Law Review (2003) 545–580. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2003025

Wells, Wyatt C.: Antitrust and the Formation of the Postwar World. New York, Columbia University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.7312/well12398

Whelan, Peter: A Principled Argument for Personal Criminal Sanctions as Punishment under EC Cartel Law. 4(1) Competition Law Review (2007) 7–40.

Whish, Richard – Bailey, David: Competition Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/law:ocl/9780199660377.001.0001

Williamson, Oliver E.: Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs. 58(1) The American Economic Review (1968) 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_7

Wu, Tim: The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the new Gilded Age. New York, Columbia Global Reports, 2018.

Zimmer, Daniel: The Goals of Competition Law. Northampton, Edward Elgar, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936615

Published

11-07-2023

How to Cite

Szilágyi, P. (2023). Competition law and monopolies in digital markets: Is competition law suitable for regulating digital markets?. In Medias Res, 12(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.1.3

Issue

Section

Articles