The Role of the DSA and the Facebook Oversight Board in the Provision of Effective Remedy on Social Media

Authors

  • Dorina Gyetván ELTE Faculty of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.2.9

Keywords:

Oversight Board, Facebook, DSA, remedy, social media

Abstract

With the rise of social media and the rapid increase in the number of decisions made by platforms regarding user content, the creation of a safe and foreseeable online environment became the center of attention (again) in the 2020s. In order to improve user safety, on the one hand, the Facebook Oversight Board was set up in October 2020, which is designed to answer some of the most difficult questions around freedom of expression online (among other human rights), primarily in accordance with Facebook’s stated values and policies, however, international human rights standards appear more and more prominently in recent Oversight Board decisions. On the other hand, the Digital Services Act requires service providers to issue statement of reasons with most of their decisions and the provision of internal complaint handling mechanisms and out-of-court dispute resolution mechanisms to review platform decisions will become a requirement. Alternative dispute resolution forums under the Digital Services Act are expected to have many characteristics in common with the Oversight Board, which can therefore be analyzed as a kind of experiment from the Act’s point of view. The experiences regarding and shortcomings of the Oversight Board so far can provide significant guidance for future reference in order to ensure that the forums will operate as efficiently as possible and therefore, ensure the fullest possible protection of users.

References

Balogh Csaba: Papíron jól mutat, de nagy kérdés, mire lesz elég a Facebook most megalakult „legfelsőbb bírósága”. HVG.hu, 2020. május 7., https://bit.ly/49V7so9.

Bankston, Kevin – Sohn, David – McDiarmid, Andrew: Shielding the Messengers: Protecting Platforms for Expression and Innovation. CDT, 2012. december, https://bit.ly/3SYFSAk.

Barata, Joan: The Decisions of the Oversight Board from the Perspective of International Human Rights Law. Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University, 2021, https://bit.ly/47syIZC.

Bayer Judit: A Facebook Ellenőrző Bizottság mint alternatív vitarendező szerv. Fundamentum, 2022/3., 5–16.

Bencze Mátyás – Kovács Ágnes: „Nem foghat helyt.” Az Alkotmánybíróság az indokolási kötelezettség teljesítéséről. MTA Law Working Papers, 2018. október, https://bit.ly/47n3cfD, 3.

Chander, Anupam: Facebookistan. 90(5) North Carolina Law Review (2012) 1807–1842.

Dias Oliva, Thiago: Content Moderation Technologies: Applying Human Rights Standards to Protect Freedom of Expression. 20(4) Human Rights Law Review (2020) 607–640., https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa032

Foer, Franklin: Facebook’s War on Free Will. The Guardian, 2017. szeptember 19., https://bit.ly/3RhmHzB.

Goldman, Eric: Content Moderation Remedies. 28(1) Michigan Technology Law (2021) 1–59., https://doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.28.1.content

Gombos Katalin: Az európai jog hatásai a jogorvoslathoz való jogra. Budapest, NKE, 2020.

Gosztonyi Gergely: A közösségi média felelősségi kérdéseinek korai szabályozása az Amerikai Egyesült Államokban és az Európai Unióban. In Mezey Barna (szerk.): Kölcsönhatások. Európa és Magyarország a jogtörténelem sodrásában. Budapest, Gondolat, 2021, 111–119.

Gosztonyi Gergely: Az internetes tartalomszabályozással kapcsolatos új gondolkodási irányok az Amerikai Egyesült Államokban. Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 2021/4., 40–54., https://doi.org/10.32980/MJSz.2021.4.1257

Gosztonyi Gergely: Cenzúra Arisztotelésztől a Facebookig. A közösségi média tartalomszabályozási gyakorlatának komplexitása. Budapest, Gondolat, 2022.

Gradoni, Lorenzo: Constitutional Review via Facebook’s Oversight Board. Verfassungsblog on Matters Constitutional, 2021. február 10., https://bit.ly/3QY6dfn.

Hern, Alex: Facebook Moderators Tell of Strict Scrutiny and PTSD Symptoms. The Guardian, 2019. február 26., https://bit.ly/3MWSp3K.

Kantrowitz, Alex: Should We Trust the Facebook Oversight Board? Big Technology, 2021. április 16., https://bit.ly/3QYml0h.

Klonick, Kate: The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent Institution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression. 129(8) The Yale Law Journal (2020) 2418–2499.

Koltay András: A social media platformok jogi státusa a szólásszabadság nézőpontjából. In Medias Res, 2019/1., 1–56., https://bit.ly/47VnzQS.

Lendvai Gergely: Zwarte Piet a Facebook Oversight Board kontextusában – a Zwarte Piet és a kulturális különbségek értelmezése. Ars Boni, 2022/3–4., 22–31.

MacKinnon, Rebecca et al.: Fostering Freedom Online: The Role Of Internet Intermediaries. Paris, UNESCO, 2014.

Murphy, Hannah: Facebook’s Oversight Board: An Imperfect Solution to a Complex Problem, The Washington Post, 2021. szeptember 24., https://bit.ly/3usqIJs.

Nicholas, Gabriel: Shedding Light on Shadowbanning. Brussels, CDT Research, 2022, https://bit.ly/3GiUbs7.

Ortolani, Pietro: If You Build it, They Will Come. The DSA „Procedure Before Substance” Approach. In Hoboken, Joris van et al. (szerk.): Putting the DSA into Practice. Berlin, Verfassungsbooks, 2023.

Osman, Maddy: Wild and Interesting Facebook Statistics and Facts (2023). Kinsta, 2022. de-cember 6., https://bit.ly/3N1dycQ.

Pákozdi Zita: A jogerő tárgyi terjedelme a polgári perben. Szeged, SZTE, 2015.

Pánek, Martin: Appealing to Facebook’s Oversight Board. Mmister, 2021. szeptember 9., https://bit.ly/3sH9Dv6.

Paolini, Giovanni: A Constitutional Court? Institute for Internet and the Just Society, 2020. december 14., https://bit.ly/3uzB2zy.

Pásztor Emese: Állam-e a Facebook? Átlátszó, 2021. október 1., https://bit.ly/3QZwBFA.

Pongó Tamás: Új korszak az online véleménynyilvánítás korlátozásában? Gondolatok a Facebook Oversight Board működéséről. Iustum Aequum Salutare, 2020/4., 147–162.

Senftleben, Martin – Angelopoulos, Christina: The Odyssey of the Prohibition on General Monitoring Obligations on the Way to the Digital Services Act: Between Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive and Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Amsterdam–Cambridge, 2020. október, https://bit.ly/3Gk9HUK.

Streel, Alexandre de – Buiten, Miriam – Peitz, Martin: Liability of Online Hosting Platforms: Should Exceptionalism End? Report. CERRE, Brussels, 2018. szeptember, https://bit.ly/49VJWaU.

Tóth András: Az online platformok európai szabályozása. In Medias Res, 2022/2., 78–102., https://bit.ly/3R6Rcbl.

Wiener, Janet – Bronson, Nathan: Facebook’s Top Open Data Problems. 2014. október 21., https://bit.ly/47wTZ4z.

Wong, David – Floridi, Luciano: Meta’s Oversight Board: A Review and Critical Assessment. 33 Minds and Machines (2022) 262–284.

Zombory Katarzyna: A hatékony jogorvoslathoz való jog. Jogtudományi Közlöny, 2022/12., 478–488., https://bit.ly/3NaW9hW.

Ződi Zsolt: Platformjog és felhasználóvédelem. Gazdaság és Jog, 2022/3–4., 15–18., https://bit.ly/417TQSB.

Published

14-12-2023

How to Cite

Dorina, G. (2023). The Role of the DSA and the Facebook Oversight Board in the Provision of Effective Remedy on Social Media. In Medias Res, 12(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.2.9