The links between data protection and online services
The specificities of digital resilience and interpretive primacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.13.2.4Keywords:
information society, data protection, digital resilience, interpretive primacyAbstract
The supply and demand of services in the information society takes place mainly in the online space. The role of the supervisory authorities’ (and ultimately the courts’) powers to protect our personal data has therefore become more important. Digital resilience has a major impact on twenty-first century jurisdictional activity, which is necessarily characterised by a confrontation of competing rights at the intersection of privacy and online services. Even in general, the application of European Union law requires a partially different approach to the interpretation of national law, however, data protection law has its own specificities. The activity of supervisory authorities is becoming increasingly pronounced, and the need for a law enforcement approach with a view to protecting rights is clearly evident from the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The trends also justify some of the specificities of interpretative primacy in this area of law.
References
Andenas, Mads – Fairgrieve, Duncan: Courts and Comparative Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, 117–232., https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735335.001.0001
Barnard, Catherine: The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022., https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192857880.001.0001
Bretthauer, Sebastian: Extended Powers for Other Supervisory Authorities Concerned in the Case of Cross-Border Data Processing: Facebook Ireland. Case C-645/19 Facebook Ireland Ltd and Others v. Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit. 59 Common Market Law Review (2022) 1543–1556., https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2022101
Bruyas, Pierrick: Droits fondamentaux – protection des données personnelles. Europe, 2021/8–9., Comm. 274.
Bruyas, Pierrick: Données personnelles – effacement en cas de traitement illégal. Europe, 2024/5., Comm. 199.
Douville, Thibault: L’institutionnalisation du droit européen des données à caractère personnel. Revue des affaires européennes, 2021/2., 429–435.
Dworschak, Marco: Auswirkungen von Schrems II auf den Steuerdatentransfer. Liechtensteinische Juristen-Zeitung (2020) 295–309.
Gombos Katalin: A jogértelmezés jelentősége a közösségi jogban – avagy az értelmezési elsődlegesség elvéről. Európai Jog, 2010/2., 3–10.
Gombos Katalin: Európai jog – az Európai Unió jogrendszere. Budapest, Wolters Kluwer, 2019., https://doi.org/10.55413/9789632959283
Gombos Katalin: A Digital Services Act és a Digital Markets Act várható kihívásai a jogalkalmazásban. In Medias Res, 2023/2., 92–119., https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.2.5
Graef, Inge: Meta Platforms: How the CJEU Leaves Competition and Data Protection Authorities with an Assignment. 30(3) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (2023) 325–334., https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231205836
Haberer, Anno: The Neverending Story: Neues zum Verhältnis von Kartell- und Datenschutzrecht [EuGH, Urt. v. 4.7.2023, C‑252/21 Meta Platforms Inc. u.a./BKartA]. Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (2023) 546–549.
Hriscu, Ana-Maria: C-252/21 Meta v Bundeskartellamt: The Lawfulness of Big Tech’s Processing of Personal Data and the Relationship Between Data Protection and Competition Law. 9(3) European Data Protection Law Review (2023) 371–377., https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2023/3/15
Khoury, Alessandro El: The Safe Harbour is not a Legitimate Tool Anymore. What Lies in the Future of EU-USA Data Transfers? 6(4) European Journal of Risk Regulation (2015) 659–664., https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005237
Lenaerts, Koen – Gutiérrez-Fons, José Antonio: Les méthodes d’interprétation de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne. Brussels, Bruylant, 2020.
Lenaerts, Koen – Gutiérrez-Fons, José Antonio: Az Európai Unió Bíróságának jogértelmezési módszerei (ford. Lukács Adrienn, Orbán Endre, Simon Emese Réka). Budapest, HVG-ORAC, 2022.
Nebbia, Paolisa: The Interaction of Competition, Consumer and Data Protection Laws: A Few Comments Inspired by the Recent Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. 23(4) ERA-Forum: Scripta Iuris Europaei (2023) 515–527., https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-023-00733-0
Picht, Peter G.: CJEU on Facebook: GDPR Processing Justifications and Application Competence: EuGH, Urt. vom 4.7.2023, C-252/21 Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2023) 1169–1172.
Quinn, Paul: Research under the GDPR – A Level Playing Field for Public and Private Sector Research? 17(4) Life Sciences, Society and Policy (2021), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-021-00111-z
Rizzuto, Francesco: The Implications of the Meta Ireland Platforms Ruling for the Powers of National Competition Authorities and National Regulatory and Supervisory Authorities. 44(12) European Competition Law Review (2023) 532–538.
Rotenberg, Marc: Schrems II, from Snowden to China: Toward a New Alignment on Transatlantic Data Protection. 26(1–2) European Law Journal (2020) 141–152., https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12370
Tracol, Xavier: „Schrems II”: The Return of the Privacy Shield. 39 Computer Law & Security Review (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105484
Váradi Szilvia: Az információs társadalom iránti bizalom erősítését célzó szabályozási módszerek az uniós adatvédelem területén. In Strihó Krisztina – Szegedi László (szerk.): Európai szabályozáspolitikai kihívások. Budapest, Ludovika, 2022, 195–204.
Vörös Imre: Európai jog – magyar jog: konkurencia vagy koegzisztencia? Jogtudományi Közlöny, 2011/7–8, 369–401.
Waerdt, Peter J. van de: Meta v Bundeskartellamt: Something Old, Something New. 8(3) European Papers (2023) 1077–1103.
Woods, Lorna: Facebook Ireland and the One Stop Shop under the GDPR. European Law Review (2021) 685–691.
Wünschelbaum, Markus: Datenschutzrecht. Feststellung eines DS-GVO-Verstoßes durch nationale Wettbewerbsbehörde möglich. Anmerkung: EuGH (Große Kammer), Urteil vom 4.7.2023, C-252/21 (Meta Platforms Inc. ua/BKartA). Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (2023)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Katalin Gombos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.